Mike and Phil play solid poker most of the time and have wealth of experience in big tournaments. Mike is more of the gambler and melts down with questionable plays when it seems he's tired. Phil plays extremely tight and excels against weaker fields. Phils antics I believe are semi -true, I believe his antics are meant to intimdate and cause a weaker player to get off his game. Mike is my favorite player cause he represents the common poker player. His antics are more real emotion and more good natured than Phil's. Arrogance is what I feel with Phil. They make their money off weaker players thats the way poker is meant to be played. |