View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 1st May 2008, 05:58 PM
Fictive's Avatar
Fictive Fictive is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 352
Chips: 1,450
Thanks: 10
Thanked 40 Times in 35 Posts
Default

I guess some real high stakes players could theoretically live on rakeback, they probably receive several thousand a month on rakeback alone. That being said, I'm sure that those players take a nice little chunk out of their winnings each month to boot. If they ended up on a losing streak, the rakeback needs to be put on the poker account before they end up playing at a whole lot lower limits.

As an example, I've got a great rakeback deal (won't go into details about it), and I usually get around 2-3 times the max buy-in on the level I play and I don't play insane amounts each day. Basically it's possible to get thousands of dollars in rakeback and leave the winnings in one's account, but still... don't see that happening. Highly theoretical.
__________________
Limit poker is a science, but no-limit is an art. In limit you are shooting at a target. In no-limit, the target comes alive and shoots back at you.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fictive For This Useful Post: