Thanks for all those additionnal details confirming my point
So if no one is taking
rakeback as something else than a monthly bonus or additionnal security I bet no one would play a different poker in goal to take less risks and score rakeback, right?
My point is it's a non sense to play different and rake is only something forcing you to win more, never a math to include in your play due to rakeback!
( Now that rakeback is starting to be famous a few average players think that's why they are losing and that pros are playing for rakeback only. "Even on a bad day they earn money!", heard so on my own site and that's the reason of all those questions : Definitely saying them there is no rakeback church and adepts
)