Quote:
Originally Posted by irishpkr  I just find it hard to treat this 'evidence' as objective, as by its very nature it can't be. You've invested money to play in these tournaments. You and I, and every poker player out there, we all HATE to admit a mistake. We all HATE to lose. Losing hurts, and I think for most people losing hurts a damn sight more than the joy of winning the same amount. People typically dwell on the bad things that happen as a result.
My objective answer was already given - measures are inplace to show up any irregularities, and are much tighter since AB/Ultimatebet were found out. But seriously, if you think 10-15 short tournies is enough to see this amazing pattern, I can only say: sample size. |
I do not know what happened to ultimatebet? I said 10-15 for someone to try and just observe. I have probably played over 1000 on fulltilt, so I have much more than sampled this.
I will be the first to admit a mistake. I am talking about bad beats though, not mistakes. I wouldn't feel like I made a mistake if I call an all in with AA and the guy who pushed in has A7, but in turn he gets a flop of 568 and a 9 comes on the river. This is very commin it seems, and has got me thinking Fulltilt is running something to make games go quicker.
what sites do you play at? you obviously don't feel like you are being taken. So I would like to know where I can play with such security...