View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 18th July 2008, 04:44 PM
frob23's Avatar
frob23 frob23 is offline
Veteran Member
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 682
Chips: 4,502
Thanks: 29
Thanked 133 Times in 101 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tstrachan22 View Post
I've been sharkscoping myself daily to see what my stats are because
I currently dont have pokertracker and i'd like to tighten up my game if possible. I constanly cash in Sng's as well as half the MTT's regaurdless of stake.

My question is: What is a "good" avg ROI% (return on investment) a winning player should hypothetically hold andcan u still be a winning player if you fall short of that? Because my roll keeps growing but i'm not as high as 35% ROI as that is that number i think i was told u should have awhile back. Mine is more like 15-20 even when I seem to be playing "great".

Any comments would be much appriciated
The FAQ on sharkscope talks a little about this because it's relative to the levels you're playing. The pre-sets for scope define an ROI of 15%+ as good (shark level) at the lowest level sit and gos, 10%+ at the middle levels, and 5%+ at the highest levels.

Basically, any positive ROI is better than nothing but a 35% ROI is really a super-fantastic (and probably unreasonable) expectation.
__________________
I get no respect. . . when I move all-in, people from other tables call.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to frob23 For This Useful Post: