As you can see (from my less than steller record):
Code:
6-Aug-08 18:42 NL Holdem $1 6 $3
6-Aug-08 17:56 NL Holdem $5 10 -$5.50
6-Aug-08 11:03 NL Holdem $1 6 $3
6-Aug-08 10:45 NL Holdem $1 6 -$1.20
6-Aug-08 10:24 NL Holdem $1 6 -$1.20
6-Aug-08 10:01 NL Holdem $1 6 -$1.20
5-Aug-08 12:01 NL Holdem $1 6 $3
5-Aug-08 11:48 NL Holdem $1 10 -$1.20
Those $1 games were $1+$1 bounty games... and none of the bounty wins get recorded. So my stats are weird. It's showing I have a 17% average ROI and I am down $4. The actual numbers are 19.19% and +$0.50 at this time.
These numbers are all over the place. I am glad I am keeping track of them on my own accord. I don't know what I really expected... I could see why bounties would be hard (or impossible) for SS to track when I look at it now. But this will just end up being another example of how SharkScope... despite its usefulness... has its limitations. If you were to look at this... especially as time goes on and I play more of these freaking bounty games... you'd be completely confused about my play.