View Single Post
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 25th October 2007, 01:43 PM
Echeneis81 Echeneis81 is offline
Junior Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3
Chips: 66
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

OK. I probably shouldn't bother. It was only a free roll after all. But let me explain the reason for my suspicions.

Quote:
What i CAN say is that with about 4 tables remaining i was moved to the same table as swed4141 and we were BOTH sitting IN and playing.
I was at the same table and since we were in the money I did my usual player profiling using sites like PokerDB & Offical Poker Rankings.
It turned out that you had played your first 5 tournaments (multi table sit'n'goes) the previous day (Oct 20th). Swed4141 had no registered tournaments so I'm assuming that was a new accout.
With PokerPro in the back of my head I checked swed3939 and he showed only one tounament (, on Oct 20th - start time ~ 1/2 hour after you finished your last tournament ends).

So let me summarize my thoughts:
- Out of the huge PokerStars player community your three accounts were the only ones
with the swedXXXX naming pattern that I could find using PokerDB.
- All three of you seem to have joined PokerStars at the same time (weekend
Oct 20-21).
- All three of you end up in the same Private Freeroll.
- I'm a gambling addict and I do believe in chance, but I cannot believe that that's
coincidence. Way more unlikely than hitting the jackpot in any game of chance that I
know of.
- With reports of multi-account scams on PokerStars to be found on any Poker
forum/news page, and with PokerPro clumsy attempt giving an example, I think it's far
more likely that you are a cheater.

Quote:
I do not know of who these other two players are but i do know that they are not me, and can be proved as we were at the same table at the same time both playing our cards at the same time.
Yes. Playing several accounts at the same time is the basic idea behind the multi account scam.
The only pot where both of you played was a three way pot. (I do have the hand history for that table.)
Reply With Quote