| |||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Cash Games Poker cash game discussion and strategy. |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| ||||
| I have been reading up a little on this, what I can find on the web, and see that very low or very high SPRs are best for "top pair" hands. These are the high pairs and AK, AQ, and friends. So if you can get an SPR of 4 or 5... you're good because you are committed to the hand regardless of what comes. If you have a very high SPR, you can play and still get away from it if you're convinced you're beat. The worst range is right about 13-14 for the top pair hands, because a pot sized bet on the flop and turn that gets called by one player each time will leave you with a really nasty decision on the river... where the pot will be right around the size of your stack. For the same reason, I read on one page, an SPR of 13-14 is ideal for the suited connector type hands if they are up against a top pair sort of hand... because you're going to be able to put the top pair hands in that bad spot. Does anyone have any comments? Am I hopelessly off track or confused here? Anything to add?
__________________ I get no respect. . . when I move all-in, people from other tables call. |
| ||||
| I have a feeling that I am going to need to get Professional No-Limit Hold'em for more discussion on this. I guess no one else has dealt with this concept. I find it very interesting as a method for planning your hands and deciding if you're going to commit and what you're willing to commit with.
__________________ I get no respect. . . when I move all-in, people from other tables call. |
| ||||
| Quote:
Would be nice if someone could put a little more perspective on it tho...
__________________ ~Lady~ ![]() "Most of the money you'll win at poker comes not from the brilliance of your own play, but from the ineptitude of your opponents." - Lou Krieger |
| ||||
| When I get the book, read the information, and have a better grasp of it... I will complete this thread. But right now I think that's the point I'm at. I was hoping to put buying another poker book off for a little longer.
__________________ I get no respect. . . when I move all-in, people from other tables call. |
| ||||
| Let me know the title if it is a good one...I'm about due for a new read...
__________________ ~Lady~ ![]() "Most of the money you'll win at poker comes not from the brilliance of your own play, but from the ineptitude of your opponents." - Lou Krieger |
| ||||
| I have finally picked up this book and am about 100 pages into it. So far it's actually a really good book. It hasn't got too far into the SPR thing, but I have read ahead and can see where it's going. Part of the problem with me finding the information elsewhere is that it all builds on the previous things in the book. I'm not 100% ready to produce a judgement on this book but so far I'm happy with my purchase.
__________________ I get no respect. . . when I move all-in, people from other tables call. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to frob23 For This Useful Post: | ||
| |||
| Here's an SPR example off the top of my head that might help, a often misplayed hand. Ring game, your dealt 44, or similar, and raise to 3xblind. Everyone folds down to sb, who has been playin extremely tight, even limping ak, aq. He puts 13x blind in and has 20 behind. Now there's 16x blind in pot, basically giving u a max profit potential of 36 blinds now and its 10 to call. Using the SPR (stack amount/ pot amount) (stack behind smallest in play) would tell u to fold. USing it u can figure out how much going by smallest stack in play, what range of hands u can play in what situation, and if u are going to be committed with top pair etc.... I always do the approximate math in my head, and compare odds of hitting set on flop vs stack size etc, after awhile it becomes second nature. It helps to study various winn % of hands vs certain hands. For instance even if im sure an opponent has pocket aces and i have 78 suited, i can call if i can gain 5-6 times my investment. Its helpful with small pairs and suited connectors, which can otherwise easily be played to a negative profit potential. |
| ||||
| lol... if you read the thread, you'll note that I already talked about getting the book and have even got it. I am in the process of reading it. But if you have any advice on SPR and how you use it, I would love to hear it.
__________________ I get no respect. . . when I move all-in, people from other tables call. |
| |||
| Honestly, I find it hard to believe that most players in a ring game would base their decisions on the SPR. I can see how it has some relevance, but I'm personally weighing way more factors than that. It's another number you can use to base your decisions on, but if you've been in a situation a few times, you'll know if you can or can't get away from a hand, regardless of the stack sizes. |
| |||
| Quote:
I consider SPR mostly when I am 3betting and trying to manipulate the size of the pot preflop. |
| ||||
| Even ignoring SPR itself... this book (Professional No Limit) is fantastic. It's got me thinking in whole news ways about my NL game. I no longer worry about being all-in because if it gets near there, I have been learning to think further and further ahead as well as work out the different equity ranges I have -- when considering what they will call and what range they would make a move with. I've even been checking in spots where I used to bet... knowing that if I was called I was in trouble on the next street. And that's hard for me... because I like to be the aggressive one and hate showing weakness.
__________________ I get no respect. . . when I move all-in, people from other tables call. |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Full Tlt Point conversion ratio? | Jonathank | Rakeback | 3 | 27th October 2008 11:53 AM |
| Curiosity Killed the Stack... | liladypokerpro | Cash Games | 2 | 1st May 2008 08:20 AM |
| 44 OOP, short stack decent read, what do you do? | iceveins0901 | Tournaments | 6 | 25th April 2008 02:53 PM |
| Whats the difference | MLGstacked | Cash Games | 11 | 23rd January 2008 10:33 PM |
| Full Tlt Point conversion ratio? | Jonathank | Full Tilt Poker | 1 | 22nd August 2007 07:36 AM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:26 AM.





Would be nice if someone could put a little more perspective on it tho...
~Lady~ 