Based On FULLTILT

[MikeyInc]

Whats the Worse Beat You have taking @ the FULL TILT tables? ... and Do you believe that Full Tilt Favors the Low Hand ?

[liladypokerpro]

Full Tilt is the King of horrible beats IMO......I rarely play there anymore.......waaaaaaaay too loose and just not my cup of tea. Sure I won a good bit when I played there, but not nearly as much as I should've.

[MLitteer]

I've only played at FT and PS and I think the suckouts and donkey rewards program is equal on both.

[stoffmakers]

sorry but u gotta be kidding me. if FTP, or any site for that matter, favoured the worst hand, then it wouldnt be the worst hand anymore, it would be the favourite. it may seem like theres an awful lot of bad beats online but its simply because the game is faster/you can multitable which means you see more hands and thus more bad beats. if you were to play several live games at one time, you would see more bad beats than if you were just playing 1 live table. you cant argue with numbers buddy. if ur a 99% favourite, ur still gonna lose 1 outta every 100 times.

[MikeyInc]

but lose 7 of 10 is how tilt teaches you

[stoffmakers]

dude, you seem to be giving the impression that you think online poker and FTP in particular is 'rigged'. Have you ever used any poker tracking software. I havent but I know people who have. And by quickly looking at it, you can find out exactly how often youve won with certain hands in certain situations. You can then look at the odds using any poker odds calculator and compare them to your stats. For example you could look at how often you win with pocket aces against pocket kings when you are all in preflop. Lets say youve encountered that twice in your online history, and you one once and lost once for 50%. Now the odds say you should win with aces 80+% of the time. So should you be suspicious? No because this is an extremely small sample size. But lets say your stats say that you loses with aces all in preflop against A2 90% of the time over 1000 hands, while you should be winning 90+% of the time, then and only then would I get suspicious.

[Huskers314]

Originally Posted by stoffmakers dude, you seem to be giving the impression that you think online poker and FTP in particular is 'rigged'. Have you ever used any poker tracking software. I havent but I know people who have. And by quickly looking at it, you can find out exactly how often youve won with certain hands in certain situations. You can then look at the odds using any poker odds calculator and compare them to your stats. For example you could look at how often you win with pocket aces against pocket kings when you are all in preflop. Lets say youve encountered that twice in your online history, and you one once and lost once for 50%. Now the odds say you should win with aces 80+% of the time. So should you be suspicious? No because this is an extremely small sample size. But lets say your stats say that you loses with aces all in preflop against A2 90% of the time over 1000 hands, while you should be winning 90+% of the time, then and only then would I get suspicious.

Don't try to bring common sense to the "I lost, so it's rigged" debate here. I've tried and it's not well received. LOL.

[stoffmakers]

hah alrite thanks for the info. but ill give it a try anyways lol.

[hojediade]

I don't what to answer there as i also think that FullTilt is a terrible place to play poker. I suffered so many bad beat there that i can't tell which waz the worst one. Like in a supermarket when you have too much offers.

[stoffmakers]

guess ur right huskers lol

[MikeyInc]

come on.. people i know youve been beat out bad