|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
Very good article about Kelly criterion Warning: This article is very very math heavy, if it hurts your head, don't click the link. I am expanding my knowledge and I ran across this concept and thought the article was a great one to share. Cliff notes of the article: Kelly is about comparing odds to BR/BI to determine what the optimal amount to bet is, and show profit in the long run. It also compares std dev and win rates to determine optimal bankroll requirements to move to the next level compared to a standard "Must have 40 BI" rule. This is only in play if your a winning player and you plan to move up based on math instead of moving up on principal of BIs only. Formula for Kelly (when comparing two different stakes to determine optimal bankroll for the higher of the 2 levels) is: c = (s1^2 - s2^2) / 2(m1 - m2) s1/s2 is std dev. and m1/m2 are your winrates for your expected 2 stakes. Here is the Link: http://www.jimgeary.com/poker/letters/KELLY.HTM Post replies if you have a good understanding of this I am new to this concept and would love to get to know more.Note: In the article he talks about the rule of 72, it is an investment tool, it states that whatever interest you earn on your investment divide that by 72 and that is how long it will take for your investment to grow. To apply it to poker, you'd have to do % BR (per game) /72 = # of times to double your bankroll an exampled when investing, assuming your investment makes 10% a year every year and regardless of the market it makes 10%: 10/72 = everyone 7.2 years your investment will double.
__________________ I just won $50 from you, that you could have used, to buy food, but you can't now! |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Wyte22 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
The "rule of 72" is an estimation tool used by bankers, investors, realters etc. to calculate (in their heads) the number of years it takes to double an investment, or pay of a mortgage, so you're calculation is correct. The excample in the artical is based on assumption that you win more than you loose. Lets draw it to the 5% of you're bankroll rule by chris fergusan. You start from $0 , and win $10 in a freeroll: 5% of $10 = $0.50..so using the 72 rule it would take +-36 years to make $10 000.00. Not that simple because you win, eg. $2.00 with you're $0.50, and $5.00 with you're $1.50, and it gets bigger, faster as you go up, and that is where the calcules comes in. Applying these rules to poker is a draw-back as the variations will differ from player to player. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
|
Math is idiotic.
__________________ LOST |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
Why slam it, if you cannot handle it. I would love to teach you the rule of Pi, Travs. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
|
lol donkaments.
__________________ LOST |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
|
Where does the feel player fall in?
|
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
|
feel players don't study theory as heavy, so therefore this wouldn't ever apply to them
__________________ I just won $50 from you, that you could have used, to buy food, but you can't now! |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Article - Pocket Rockets Don't Always Fly | pokerwhiz | Hand Analysis | 9 | 11th April 2008 08:18 AM |
| Stop and Go Strategy Article | liladypokerpro | Tournaments | 0 | 21st March 2008 03:26 PM |
| Article - Suited Aces and Connectors | pokerwhiz | Hand Analysis | 6 | 6th June 2007 03:19 AM |
| Article - Playing With Maniacs | pokerwhiz | Hand Analysis | 1 | 29th January 2007 11:19 PM |
| Article - Playing Medium Pairs | pokerwhiz | Hand Analysis | 2 | 5th December 2006 03:12 PM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:21 AM.

.png)






















I am new to this concept and would love to get to know more.

