#1 (permalink)  
Old 17th August 2006, 11:32 PM
Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 44
Chips: 234
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default When Did the Rules Change?

A littel poker history/trivia here. I had a deck of cards when I was growing up that was my dads, so it was several years old already when I got it, and now it would probably be close to 35-40 years old. I wish I still had it, but I don't.

I know that the rules in that deck said that a Full House beat a Straight and a Flush beat a Full House. It used to be that way. I started playing poker again just a few months ago and realized that this was not true anymore. When did this change?? It confused the heck outta me at first, but now it isn't an issue anymore. I am just curious.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 17th August 2006, 11:46 PM
Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 84
Chips: 1,272
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

As far as I know, a Full House does still beat a straight or a flush, though that doesnt mean that there arent some oddities in the way hands rank in poker though..
I've always thought it wierd that a Flush beats a Straight.. I mean, statistically , you're more likely to make a flush than you are a straight, yet the flush still wins..

and lets not forget about 3 of a kind, which with any two cards, is a 2 or a 3 out hand.. far less likely to hit trips than to catch a flush or a straight.. Anyone else ever thought this was strange or know why it is like this?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to winningedge For This Useful Post:
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23rd August 2006, 01:34 AM
Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 95
Chips: 408
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

That confused me as well recently, though I think I've finally got it straight.

I would think they would revisit things so that the rank of hands matched up properly with the odds. It's just numbers, after all. I'm a math geek and I could probably figure it out myself.

But hey, that would be too obvious.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 24th August 2006, 03:32 PM
Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 44
Chips: 234
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winningedge
As far as I know, a Full House does still beat a straight or a flush, though that doesnt mean that there arent some oddities in the way hands rank in poker though..
Ok, I said it backwards, didn't I? Yes, today, a flush beats a FH. But the deck I had said that a FH beat both a Straight and a Flush. Here is the order:

Pair
3 of a Kind
Straight
FH
Flush
4 of a Kind
Straight Flush
Royal Flush

Flush and FH used to be switched in this list.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 25th August 2006, 08:11 PM
Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 84
Chips: 1,272
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

nope.. you've still got that switched around.. your FH should be higher than the flush.. it is trumped only by 4 of kind, straight flush, or royal flush as shown below

Straight
Flush
FH
4kind
Straight Flush
Royal Flush
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 8th September 2006, 09:37 PM
Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 40
Chips: 371
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Well I'm glad to see that someone finally put it the right way. I have been playing poker for 40 years and as far as I know that is the way it has always been. I don't ever remember it being any other way.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 8th September 2006, 10:30 PM
Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 34
Chips: 411
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Sounds to me like you got a deck of cards manufactured by someone who really didn't know poker. I have never heard of a flush beating a full house in my life.
__________________
PokerPrincess
Live, Love, Laugh
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 9th September 2006, 03:04 AM
Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 44
Chips: 234
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Well, perhaps I am on crack then. I wish that I still had that deck of cards that my dad had when I was young so that I could verify, but I don't. Thanks for the replies, though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07 AM.