Go Back   Rakeback Poker Forum > Poker > Poker People
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Poker People Professional poker players, amateurs, and people in the business.


Register an account to Rakeback.comRakebackBetter Get There Blog
View Poll Results: Which Amateur turned Pro is the best?
Robert Varkonyi 0 0%
Chris Moneymaker 2 4.76%
Greg Raymer 18 42.86%
Joseph Hachem 20 47.62%
Jamie Gold 1 2.38%
Jerry Yang 1 2.38%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 03:21 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 532
Chips: 1,493
Thanks: 20
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Default Who's the best 'Amateur turned pro'? Did they deserve it?

I have been wondering which amateur turned pro by winning the Main Even of the WSOP is the best out of them all. Many of my buddies say that none of them deserved to win that coveted bracelet. This is a dispute that I have been having with them for quite some time.

I don't know which is the best personally, but I do think that some of them did get really lucky or else they wouldn't have gotten the title, but that is poker. But then again, some of them did make some really good plays, and some good reads/lay downs. But I would really like to hear what you all think so I could further discuss this with my poker buddies.

And if it's any consolation, who do you think is the best pro?

I think that Scotty Nguyen and Daniel Negreanu are the best at reading people, making good plays, and basically having a good time while playing poker.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 03:35 AM
iceveins0901's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 350
Chips: 1,363
Thanks: 6
Thanked 32 Times in 28 Posts
Default

I think Raymer is the best of this list, maybe then Hachem in 3rd while Varkonyi and Moneymaker tie for 4th, then there are the other two...

there is no second place in this list.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 03:45 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 532
Chips: 1,493
Thanks: 20
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Lol, no 2nd place... Anyone else have something to say on either mine or iceveins0901's posts???
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 04:08 AM
iceveins0901's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 350
Chips: 1,363
Thanks: 6
Thanked 32 Times in 28 Posts
Default

after doing a little research, apparently Hachem has done better than I have noticed, I dont get around to too much TV or poker news sites, but apparently he has finished well and actually won some big poker events besides the main event.

the bottom 4 are still losers though, sweet, rich, losers... how i would love to lose like that.......
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 04:14 AM
liladypokerpro's Avatar
Veteran Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,989
Chips: 3,679
Thanks: 249
Thanked 171 Times in 145 Posts
Blog Entries: 13
Send a message via AIM to liladypokerpro Send a message via MSN to liladypokerpro Send a message via Yahoo to liladypokerpro
Default

Although I like Raymer, I had to go with Joe...he's really done a magnificent job since starting out. Not to mention he's quite entertaining to watch, and his fans always rooting behind him "Aussie Aussie Aussie Oi Oi Oi!" LOL
__________________
~Lady~
"Most of the money you'll win at poker comes not from the brilliance of your own play, but from the ineptitude of your opponents." - Lou Krieger
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 04:15 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 532
Chips: 1,493
Thanks: 20
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Default

But this is based on who you personally think is the best. You could argue that Joe Hachem has done better, but that Greg Raymer is the better player, just not as lucky. (or something like that.:P)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 04:19 AM
liladypokerpro's Avatar
Veteran Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,989
Chips: 3,679
Thanks: 249
Thanked 171 Times in 145 Posts
Blog Entries: 13
Send a message via AIM to liladypokerpro Send a message via MSN to liladypokerpro Send a message via Yahoo to liladypokerpro
Default

Yes that is what I was saying, sorry I didn't clarify better...just got home from work and rushing a bit...I like Raymer, but he's been around a bit longer than Joe, so as far as best amateurs gone pro, I have to say that in this case I do believe that Joe tops my list.
__________________
~Lady~
"Most of the money you'll win at poker comes not from the brilliance of your own play, but from the ineptitude of your opponents." - Lou Krieger
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 04:22 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 532
Chips: 1,493
Thanks: 20
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Lol, thats ok. I saw this thread contest and I figured this topic would be my chances of winning that. But me personally, I think Greg Raymer is the best Amateur gone Pro.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 04:26 AM
liladypokerpro's Avatar
Veteran Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,989
Chips: 3,679
Thanks: 249
Thanked 171 Times in 145 Posts
Blog Entries: 13
Send a message via AIM to liladypokerpro Send a message via MSN to liladypokerpro Send a message via Yahoo to liladypokerpro
Default

That's cool....good luck on getting a nomination...you should get some good responses, I think.
__________________
~Lady~
"Most of the money you'll win at poker comes not from the brilliance of your own play, but from the ineptitude of your opponents." - Lou Krieger
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 04:35 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 532
Chips: 1,493
Thanks: 20
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Me too. This topic has gotten me in some real heated arguments and has gotten some wide responces from many people in the past.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 05:46 AM
liladypokerpro's Avatar
Veteran Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,989
Chips: 3,679
Thanks: 249
Thanked 171 Times in 145 Posts
Blog Entries: 13
Send a message via AIM to liladypokerpro Send a message via MSN to liladypokerpro Send a message via Yahoo to liladypokerpro
Default

I can imagine so...some folks might not even remember when those people were amateurs, since they really only started being televised and talked about regularly once they became regular winners in the lime light. So it's really a good topic to get you thinking about way back when....okay so it wasn't THAT long ago for some of them, but still, you get the idea LOL
__________________
~Lady~
"Most of the money you'll win at poker comes not from the brilliance of your own play, but from the ineptitude of your opponents." - Lou Krieger
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 06:27 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 532
Chips: 1,493
Thanks: 20
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Lol, yeah. But like you said, most people don't cinsider them amateurs because they know them as Main Event winners... It should be that people remember them because they were once not a pro and won the big one. This should bring that to people's eyes and get a good pool running.:P
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 06:45 AM
liladypokerpro's Avatar
Veteran Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,989
Chips: 3,679
Thanks: 249
Thanked 171 Times in 145 Posts
Blog Entries: 13
Send a message via AIM to liladypokerpro Send a message via MSN to liladypokerpro Send a message via Yahoo to liladypokerpro
Default

Totally agree
__________________
~Lady~
"Most of the money you'll win at poker comes not from the brilliance of your own play, but from the ineptitude of your opponents." - Lou Krieger
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 02:12 PM
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 156
Chips: 904
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Default

iono why u added did they deserve it to the thread name. how could they not deserve it?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 29th May 2008, 08:13 PM
liladypokerpro's Avatar
Veteran Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,989
Chips: 3,679
Thanks: 249
Thanked 171 Times in 145 Posts
Blog Entries: 13
Send a message via AIM to liladypokerpro Send a message via MSN to liladypokerpro Send a message via Yahoo to liladypokerpro
Default

wow gamer, it's a pretty close race between Raymer and Haschem......too bad nobody is posting why they voted for them...might turn into another heated discussion LOL
__________________
~Lady~
"Most of the money you'll win at poker comes not from the brilliance of your own play, but from the ineptitude of your opponents." - Lou Krieger
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 30th May 2008, 03:22 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 532
Chips: 1,493
Thanks: 20
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Default

So far, it's a close race between Joseph Hachem and Greg Raymer! Come on guys, post why you think there the best. I personally voted for Greg Raymer because he has more poise, more patience, and I think he can read people better than the other people. Plus, he has a really good way of thinking of strategys.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 30th May 2008, 05:47 AM
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 101
Chips: 435
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

1. greg raymer 2. joe hachem 3. varkonyi 456. -pickem (dead money)

I will also agree hachem has been more succesful overall than raymer, but i think raymer is better player. The 2 have completely different styles, which has come in to play, as raymer's is riskier but more condusive to massive chip leads.

An interesting side note, Hachem is the only tight player in the group.

I would bet that the latter 3 will not cash in a single even this year.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 30th May 2008, 07:57 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 532
Chips: 1,493
Thanks: 20
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Default

I would be on your side of the bet rakmupagain. Lol.

But looks like Joseph Hachem is in the lead now.

I don't know a lot about there playing styles, but I do know that the top two people in the lead right now should be in the lead. The question is who is better...
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 30th May 2008, 10:36 PM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 532
Chips: 1,493
Thanks: 20
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Come on peeps, I know you have something to say about this. Help me out a little and just post your oppinions.:P
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 1st June 2008, 12:27 AM
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 532
Chips: 1,493
Thanks: 20
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Seems more and more people are voting and not posting...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:28 AM.