Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Default Phil Hellmuth and Mike Mattusow

    Why do you think these two "poker brats" are so successful? Granted their skills cannot go unnoticed, but do you think their ranting antics are just a part of their strategy?
    I see you talking but all I hear is blah blah blah

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8

    Default

    They're successful because they can pick apart weaker tournament players, and because tv time gives them sponsorship money. They are both huge losers in side games.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,258

    Default

    I heard Barry Greenstein table talking at last year's WSOP that Phil is very good at playing against a weak field. His antics should also throw off many players, but there is no way it is all intentional. Too genuine, give him an Oscar if its not

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    59

    Default

    I would hope it's part of their strategy but I'm afraid it's also their natural personality lol , one is very successful because he can really play well when he's not acting like a 4 year old and the other is successful because he gets a lot of tv time acting like that lmao

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    10

    Default

    Mike and Phil play solid poker most of the time and have wealth of experience in big tournaments. Mike is more of the gambler and melts down with questionable plays when it seems he's tired. Phil plays extremely tight and excels against weaker fields. Phils antics I believe are semi -true, I believe his antics are meant to intimdate and cause a weaker player to get off his game. Mike is my favorite player cause he represents the common poker player. His antics are more real emotion and more good natured than Phil's. Arrogance is what I feel with Phil. They make their money off weaker players thats the way poker is meant to be played.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    156

    Default

    because they are sick players. but also cuz amateurs dont mind donking off their chips to them so they can have a story about how a poker brat beat them in the WSOP.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    494

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mollila View Post
    I heard Barry Greenstein table talking at last year's WSOP that Phil is very good at playing against a weak field. His antics should also throw off many players, but there is no way it is all intentional. Too genuine, give him an Oscar if its not
    Yup, heard that too. Some poker pro said that he is great against mediocre players, but mediocre against great players.Then again, 11 bracelets... you gotta be good.
    Limit poker is a science, but no-limit is an art. In limit you are shooting at a target. In no-limit, the target comes alive and shoots back at you.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •