A good friend of mine was reading some threads over my shoulder, and brought up a very interesting question. I thought perhaps it would get a good response here, so I am taking dictation as it is told to me by my friend LOL. Have fun with this one!
Many people have brought up that their dominant hands are consistently being beaten too often by weak or utterly ridiculous hands.
To examine the objective of Online poker sites, such as: Absolute, Poker Stars and Full Tilt, one must ask these questions:
Q: Who are the main targets of these sites through mass media advertising?
A: New or fairly inexperienced players. Why? Because, through advertising, these sites state things such as: "Learn, chat and play with the pros," or "Play for free and learn to play like the pros."
NOW FOR THE WHOPPER QUESTION THAT I THINK WILL GET A HUGE RESPONSE:
Q: Would it be unlikely to assume, that because these sites' goals are to attract these new or less-experienced players, the site would not be inclined to favor these players in order to keep them coming back?
While pondering this, take also into consideration how many of these players just "happen" to catch their miracle card on the river. Although it is difficult to fathom how such a populous site could be in this way "controlled," it is by no means unheard of nor impossible.
If the multitude of new players lost consistently to the better players, would that be good business in the eyes of these sites? Of course not. Your thoughts?



I see you talking but all I hear is blah blah blah
Reply With Quote

Suckouts happen and poker players have a great memory about the losing suckout, what about all the times when you were behind and hit? It happens both ways. If it seems you are being sucked out more often than not, it means you are getting your money in with the best hand, in the long run it will pay off, but there will be bursts of bad luck along the way.

Hell, this month I'm down nearly 5x max buy-in, lost that money mostly due to suckouts, but regardless those hands are very profitable in the long run.

Bookmarks