Okay, here's something for you all to argue over LOL![]()
***This is just made-up for your entertainment, so don't bite my head off about it, okay?? LOL
******PS THE TITLE SHOULD SAY "THREE ALL IN," NOT FOUR...******
==================================================
Imagine this:
You are in a regular tournament which has passed the first break. No rebuys, no add ons, nothing left...just what's in front of you...
You are at a 9 seat table, with 8 players seated. You've been at this same table for about an hour. You have seen that this has been an extremely tight table, and you have noticed NO distinguishable bluffs or bad hands played by the players at this table. The blind levels are 150/300.
Seat 1 has: 5800 in chips
Seat 2 has: 4300 in chips
Seat 3 has: 4350 in chips
Seat 4 has: 5890 in chips
Seat 5 has: 6440 in chips
Seat 6 has: 4660 in chips (D)
Seat 7 has: 3425 in chips (SB)
Seat 8 has: 2360 in chips (BB)
You are the player in Seat 7...
Now...the cards are dealt, and you receive JJ...
Seat 1: Folds
Seat 2: Raises to ALL IN
Seat 3: Calls 4300
Seat 4: Folds
Seat 5: Calls 4300
Seat 6: Folds
Seat 7: (?????????)
Seat 8: We Will Assume Folds
Given that 1 Player has gone ALL IN, and 2 other Players have CALLED, what would you do with your JJ ?
Would you expect, that since this has been an extremely tight table, that just perhaps, they may all have each other's outs, and therefore go ALL IN with your JJ ?
Or would you quickly fold your JJ and wait for a "better ALL IN worthy" hand, being sure to consider that the blinds are catching up with your stack?
HAVE FUN WITH THIS!





I see you talking but all I hear is blah blah blah
Reply With Quote


POKER CHAMP


Bookmarks