Poker Pro's vs. Play Chips
Me and some of my friends have been discussing some things about online poker, and they brought up a good topic. Some of them had said that poker pro's would not do good in play chip cash games for low limits, or they would lose it because there is too many donks in play chips than in real money. But some of them had said that it would be no different than real money if the stakes were high enough in play chips.
I have observed and personally playing in the cash games for play chips up to the 3k/6k limits and have lost it all because too many people will play crap just because they can. When I ask them why are they doing that in such high limits, even play chips, they always respond: 'Because I can, because it's play chips, and that is how I got here.' Or some crap like that. But would they play the same if a pro was on that play chip cash game?
I played with a Stud player on FTP in a HORSE cash game for Play Chips at the 200/400 limits. Of course he gets paid to sit down anywhere because he is a pro, but the action didn't seem to change before he sat down at that table, or after he left. People were still donking off there chips, sucking out 2 outers on the last card to come (either flop games or stud games), and they didn't seem to care. All the pro could do was sit back, play tight, hope for the best, and say 'NH', or 'Nice hand.' whenever he lost (which was frequently at this table). I played with him numerous times at the play chip tables, and he doesn't seem to be up or down in profits. But I had observed his cash game profits and he was steadily increasing his bankroll there, instead of it staying the same at the play chips.
So my ultimate question: Do you think Poker Pro's would do as good in play chip games as they do for real money?
Want a real challenge? PM me about the Chris Ferguson challenge! (which I can now say I have completed myself!)
"I came into this world against my consent, and I will leave this world against my will." -Phil Laak
Bookmarks