I'm very confused by your post. Negreanu probably didn't win that tourney because he got unlucky or made a move for the pot against an unmoveable hand. Obviously he is one of the best players in the world, so I don't see why you think he gives off more tells than a pathetic Bigler. And if you're not doing a Danny Vs. Chris, why are you comparing them for the span of two tourneys? I beat Scott Fischman in a couple pots on Full Tilt, and I don't think that makes me better than him haha.
Anyways, to the main point of your post (maybe?), I respect a player's game when it's pretty unknown. Meaning that they win a lot of pots without you ever seeing their cards. That means they most likely know when to apply pressure and when to fold in the proper situations. And when you do see their cards, they are on the winning side of it almost all of the time. Their style could be super aggressive like Ivey, or tight/aggresive like a Chris Ferguson. I'll respect either one if they are keeping their hole cards a mystery and winning money.
Think for yourself. Question authority.
Bookmarks