Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    107

    Default Poker Stars needs Rake Back

    The title is what it is. Poker Stars needs rakeback.com/">Rake Back like Paris Hilton needs a penicillin shot.

    I just discovered PS's DoN games. I cashed in my one game. It's not too hard. Wait for big hands, play them. As everybody else says, they are boring as heck, and people find it very easy to profit on them. I'll grind on these all day.

    The only down side I've seen is people tend to fish out, and it takes all the thinking out for the fish that are everywhere on PS. But, a 50% pay out is awesome IMO. I look at this like I look at my workouts.

    DoN games are the protein that supplements my workouts.

    My point however, is if you play the micro 1.10 DoN you only pocket 90 cents if you get top 5. This is one example of why Rake Back needs to go to Poker Stars.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,033

    Default

    So you can get 2 cents more per tourney? That's massive. Plus, PokerStars has EASILY the best VIP club. If you make it, you get way more than you can make with rakeback.
    Think for yourself. Question authority.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,792

    Default

    Not a fan of the double or nothing tournaments. I get too bored and don't play them correctly. The only time I ever had fun with them is when I loaded 9 of them up at once.
    But as far as rakeback is concerned, I think pokerstars is doing something right. Plus their rake on their ring tables doesn't seem to be as much as other sites, at least at the lower limits.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    107

    Default True

    I do agree. Full Tilt definitely redid their rake. I hate it now.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    350

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Clearwheezy View Post
    I do agree. Full Tilt definitely redid their rake. I hate it now.
    How did they "re-do" their rake? It is still 5% up to a $60 pot ($3 max), unless i am missing something.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    107

    Default Hmmm

    Maybe I'm missing something. I thought FTP switched it up about a month ago. Pots were no longer for example two dollars, they were 1.98 or something like that.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    350

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Clearwheezy View Post
    Maybe I'm missing something. I thought FTP switched it up about a month ago. Pots were no longer for example two dollars, they were 1.98 or something like that.
    Huh???

    I don't have any idea what this means.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,033

    Default

    So, if the example you used is correct, which it's not, you're mad about FullTilt taking 1% rake?!? FullTilt has never changed their rake. Where did you get this theory from?
    Think for yourself. Question authority.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    107

    Default

    Travs, can you see where I said or something like that? It was messed up. Here is what one guy posted after working it all out. It happened back in February. This is as posted by Vector space

    Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:15 am Post subject:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For $.05/$.10, the rake was lowered from a previous 10%.

    For $.10/$.25 it is the same percentage, but we're actually paying slightly more rake now since it is taken more frequently.

    $.01 is taken for every $.20 in the pot. Previously, $.05 was taken for every $1 in the pot.

    A pot of $2.55 contains 12 whole $.20 pieces or 2 whole $1 pieces. So the current rake would be $.12 while the previous rake was $.10.

    The vast differences come on pots close to whole dollars. A $.75 pot was not previously raked, but now raked $.03. A $5.80 pot is now raked $.29 and previously was $.25.

    In conclusion, the current rake is at a minimum the same as the previous rake or at a maximum $.04 more than the previous rake. When the max rake is $3, this doesn't seem that bad. Also, you can now customize bets at this level to the nearest $.01 instead of the nearest $.05 which is pretty cool. You can bet $6.66 if you want.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,033

    Default

    In conclusion, knock yourself out.

    http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/rake.php
    Think for yourself. Question authority.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    446

    Default

    Those little differences in Full Tilt rake do help you build up FTP faster though. Before, you used to only get .05 FTP per $1 in the pot. Now you are getting .01 FTP per $.20 in the pot. So yes, a little more rounded out rake but the FTP and rakeback are more rounded out as well. I see it as a tradeoff.
    "I'd like to play a game. The rules are simple."

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3

    Default rake back?!

    i have an account with pokerstars, however i dont have a rakeback deal.Is there anyway i can get one with poker stars?? thank you for any suggestions

  13. #13
    tony's Avatar
    tony is offline Former Customer Relationship Coordinator
    Rakeback.com
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,108

    Default

    Hey pokerbotlee2,

    Rakeback for Poker Stars is not available. This poker room is not sharing it's rake information.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 14th December 2008, 07:11 PM
  2. Rake back to poker stars player
    By GROZA33 in forum PokerStars
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 5th November 2008, 02:00 PM
  3. Allowed / Banned Online Sites
    By DEBRASEID in forum Poker Rooms and Networks
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2nd April 2008, 06:25 PM
  4. Allowed / Banned Online Sites
    By DEBRASEID in forum Poker Rooms and Networks
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 23rd March 2008, 04:51 PM
  5. Harvard professors back online poker
    By Mika Ollila in forum Industry and Legislation
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10th December 2007, 03:44 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •