A is retarded, B is retarded reasoning, C is retarded reasoning, D is retarded.
For C, why would you want someone to put you on AA when you have QQ? You aren't bluffing. You are playing QQ for value, I'm assuming.
If you're playing a hand for value, every time you bet or raise you have to think, "Will they call this bet/raise with a worse hand?" If they can't call with a worse hand, you're turning your hand into a bluff.
This would make D really stupid, because you're only going to get called by better, turning the third best starting hand (QQ) into a bluff pf. You could be shoving with any 2 cards and you're still only going to get called by KK or AA. Why waste a good hand and turn it into a bluff?
C is a decent option, minus the reasoning. Raise to 55 for value if you think they call with JJ (or less) or AK.
B is bad reasoning, but a decent option. If the villian who raised to 20 is never calling a 3bet here with less than KK, calling is the best option for value purposes. You can get them to cbet air and take down a nice pot. Obv you can lose, too, but this is a cash game, you don't need to protect your hand by shoving pf.
A is just pure badness.
These are difficult situations though. There's a lot to think about that I'm sure most people disregard. Good post.
Think for yourself. Question authority.
Bookmarks