This is my first real post, other than my introduction, so hopefully you don't all rip me to shreds.
I'm playing on two sites, nordica and fulltilt. I am excited to have gotten a bunch of free money from full tilt, and added my own winnings from the first free ten dollars they gave me. I'm happy with my success there, it is small, and has been a lot of work, but I am happy anyway.
However, the same actions on nordica have not produced anything. On nordica I can't seem to get ahead at all, and now I'm down half my deposit, it's a small amount, but compared to full tilt, where I technically deposited nothing at all, it feels huge.
My first thought is there are fewer players on nordica, and I am often playing with the same people, so they caught on to how I play. Since I was playing short, my moves consisted mostly of betting preflop when I had a hand and shoving on a flop. But the reasoning doesn't seem to stand up when I look at what I'm losing with... KK, AK, AA, etc. I will get called preflop and the other person will either flop his set (which seems to always be a very low pair) or river me.
Maybe the type of people on one site are more likely to call? Maybe they are 'worse' players on one site than another?
So I'm back to thinking it's just luck, which is good one place and bad somewhere else.


Reply With Quote



Bookmarks