Okay follow up question since everyone seems to agree that this is an easy ship. I'm going to play devil's advocate a bit and see what ranges make this a profitable move. I have a question at the end of this. Hope you make it through the math.
Lets say that this shortstack is pretty loose, and we put him on the 3-bet range of: AA-22; AK-A10o; Axs; Any Broadway Cards
Against our AKo we get the following:
%Win 57.08%
%Tie 5.58%
Odds 0.67 to 1
I think it is safe to say that is "fat" enough equity to shove, given the dead money already in the pot. But, is there anyone out there who is playing microstakes that feels there is even "fatter" value out there?
Now, what happens if we're facing a tight short stack (2% 3-bet all positions) and you can put him on a 3-bet range of: AA-22, AK-AQs, AKo
Against our AKo we get the following:
Win 39.23%
Tie 10.82%
Odds 1.24 to 1
YUCK!
Even if we give him a more realistic 3-bet range of: AA-22, AK-AJs, AK-AQo, KQs
Against our AKo we get:
%Win 44.09%
%Tie 9.85%
Odds 1.04 to 1
Notice that we're losing money even when our opponent's raising range only includes PPs and hands we tie and hands we dominate.
Last but not least, a typical (imo, please feel free to comment on this range) shortstacker's 3-bet from any position: AA-22, AK-AJs/o KQ-KJs/o QJs/o
Against our AKo we have:
%Win 51.50%
%Tie 7.05%
Odds 0.82 to 1
If we put villain on this type of range, does anyone feel that the equity in this move is too thin? (Especially since we know he's never folding.)
Bookmarks