Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,042

    Default RUSH...16-tabling

    Just played 4 tables each from nl5 to nl50. I only played for about 10 minutes before I had to quit in fear of going crosseyed. Has anybody else tried this out of curiousity like I just did?
    Think for yourself. Question authority.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    372

    Default

    No way. I don't think I could come close to handling that. The most I have done is 6 tables.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by travz21 View Post
    Just played 4 tables each from nl5 to nl50. I only played for about 10 minutes before I had to quit in fear of going crosseyed. Has anybody else tried this out of curiousity like I just did?
    I saw one of the pros playing like 14 the other day... I thought he was pretty crazy. 16 is for a madman.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,042

    Default

    The pro Somyung Sim, or something close to that spelling, 12 tables rush. He plays 4 each of nl200 fullring, nl200 6max, and nl100 6max. If he gets 100% rakeback he'd get like ~$220 an hour playing 0BB/100 poker. Plus whatever pros earn on top of that. No wonder I see him playing all the time.
    Think for yourself. Question authority.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,794

    Default

    Yeah, it was that Somyung Sim guy... there was one day I saw him mixing in $10NL and even 1 $5NL table too... not sure why, but he was sitting down there.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    158

    Default

    i struggle with two tables. (i still do it sometimes). correct me if i'm wrong here but i can't see how anyone playing ten + tables can actually "PLAY POKER" in the usual sense of the term . (never mind at rush poker, just normal must be hard enough).it must be quite a strict formulaic version of the game from what i can see.


    is it? trav? anyone?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by keanosdog View Post
    i struggle with two tables. (i still do it sometimes). correct me if i'm wrong here but i can't see how anyone playing ten + tables can actually "PLAY POKER" in the usual sense of the term . (never mind at rush poker, just normal must be hard enough).it must be quite a strict formulaic version of the game from what i can see.


    is it? trav? anyone?


    You don't want to go there!!!

    Well anyway, here we go again...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by economist89 View Post


    You don't want to go there!!!

    Well anyway, here we go again...
    just asking the question. i honestly don't know the answer. it's just my perception. maybe it can be done.

    thats why i asked.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,042

    Default

    Most players who can't play more than 2 tables don't really have the mental capacity or intelligence to "play poker". I understand what you're saying, though. Yeah, we'd play better if we didn't play so many tables. We'd also make less money.
    Think for yourself. Question authority.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by travz21 View Post
    Most players who can't play more than 2 tables don't really have the mental capacity or intelligence to "play poker". .
    heh heh.

    well i can't trav. i can compute information with 15 seconds to think about it.i would prefer more time but i'm getting used to it.reduce that to 5 seconds if i have 3 tables on go at once and i'd have no chance.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by keanosdog View Post
    just asking the question. i honestly don't know the answer. it's just my perception. maybe it can be done.

    thats why i asked.
    travz and I had a lengthy discussion on this topic. that's what i meant lol.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by economist89 View Post
    travz and I had a lengthy discussion on this topic. that's what i meant lol.
    link me a thread?

    if you can mate, please.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by keanosdog View Post
    i struggle with two tables. (i still do it sometimes). correct me if i'm wrong here but i can't see how anyone playing ten + tables can actually "PLAY POKER" in the usual sense of the term . (never mind at rush poker, just normal must be hard enough).it must be quite a strict formulaic version of the game from what i can see.


    is it? trav? anyone?
    When I first started, 2 tables stressed me out. Eventually I got used to that. Then 4 tables stressed me out. But then I got used to that. Then I was gifted a large 24" hi def monitor, and slowly worked my way up to 12 tables. Now 12 doesn't stress me out, and sure, I'm not playing my "A" game on every table, but my "B" game is still better than most people at the stakes I play, so I am still able to turn a profit, and 12 tables of "B" game is a lot more profit than 1 or 2 tables of "A" game. 4 Tables of rush to me feels near the equivalent of 12 regular tables, so I don't get how people can up the rush tables more, but eventually I'm sure I'll start adding more rush tables to the mix.

    keano, the thread with the discussion about multi-tabling is here.. I'm not going to reread everything to find out exactly where the discussion starts, but the thread is pretty lengthy... but it is in there.
    http://www.rakeback.com/poker-forum/...bad-fold-8434/

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    305

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by travz21 View Post
    Just played 4 tables each from nl5 to nl50. I only played for about 10 minutes before I had to quit in fear of going crosseyed. Has anybody else tried this out of curiousity like I just did?
    You are a sick man
    Only tried 12 tables of rush, mayb I can do 13 or 14 but 16 seems impossible for me but I havent tried it yet.
    Winning Player

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,042

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by specunder View Post
    You are a sick man
    Only tried 12 tables of rush, mayb I can do 13 or 14 but 16 seems impossible for me but I havent tried it yet.
    I don't think I've ever tried 9-15 tables before even. I just felt like trying out 16 haha. Not gonna do it again.
    Think for yourself. Question authority.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    830

    Default

    Jesus Christ, I'm very comfortable with 4 and may well step it up to 5 or 6 soon when I move up, but I just tried 8 tables and my head exploded! It might just have been that they were quite small on my 23inch monitor, but still. No idea how you can play well on 8 tables Travis, much respect.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phaul View Post
    Jesus Christ, I'm very comfortable with 4 and may well step it up to 5 or 6 soon when I move up, but I just tried 8 tables and my head exploded! It might just have been that they were quite small on my 23inch monitor, but still. No idea how you can play well on 8 tables Travis, much respect.
    Yeah, I second that. I am quite content with 4. I wouldn't say very comfortable, but I feel comfortable with 4. I haven't even tried to step it up to 8. I can't imagine my results being very positive at all 8-tabling rush. I think it'd take me quite a long period of time of 5-6 tabling to make the adjustment.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,042

    Default

    I don't play well. I should be crushing the pathetic competition at nl50 and 100, but I just leak all over the world when I 8table Rush.
    Think for yourself. Question authority.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    3,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by travz21 View Post
    I don't play well. I should be crushing the pathetic competition at nl50 and 100, but I just leak all over the world when I 8table Rush.
    I can't imagine why in the world 8 tabling rush might cause leaks.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    830

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by travz21 View Post
    I don't play well. I should be crushing the pathetic competition at nl50 and 100, but I just leak all over the world when I 8table Rush.
    Lol .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Multi tabling vs single\double tabling
    By ballboy75 in forum Cash Games
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 23rd February 2010, 03:39 AM
  2. rush
    By millionaire in forum General Poker Topics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 1st February 2010, 10:31 AM
  3. Multi-tabling 6-max $2 NL trial...
    By dew12109 in forum Cash Games
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 21st September 2009, 11:00 AM
  4. 6 tabling or more
    By Clearwheezy in forum General Poker Topics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 17th September 2009, 03:15 AM
  5. Multi Tabling Online...Breaking up the Boredom
    By fharmas in forum General Poker Topics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 27th March 2009, 03:02 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •