I think he must have some "covenant" with the devil, the only way to even guess why he can not have another explanation.
or is it pure abilities ?????????????????????????????
I think he must have some "covenant" with the devil, the only way to even guess why he can not have another explanation.
or is it pure abilities ?????????????????????????????
Last edited by dew12109; 4th April 2010 at 10:59 PM.
I play better than Negreanu.
Think for yourself. Question authority.
I like Daniel but wouldn't consider him a "GOD."
One flaw I see in his style is that his loose calls aren't balanced w/ lose bets (bluffs). Dwan is much more balanced, but as we know/discussed, his bluffs are ridiculously risky.
face, like a regular guy do this reading for me this is the devil's look at this video
YouTube- Grande leitura por Daniel Negreanu no WSOP
IMPOSSIBLE!!!!:
:
Last edited by dew12109; 4th April 2010 at 11:00 PM.
It's funny because Daniel would probably have played AK like that on the turn, which is lol. The spewmaster/payoff wizard at his best.
Think for yourself. Question authority.
guy, daniel only lost because he did not know Dwan play this hand
if it were not so he would read his hand
but one of the best played hand by Negreanu is that it gives very, very bad luck even
YouTube- High Stakes Poker - Hansen Negreanu - Big Pot
Last edited by dew12109; 4th April 2010 at 11:00 PM.
Daniel looks very scared in the hand. Not something I'd expect from a "GOD."
After watching a little more HSP, I agree he is a little spewy. However, imo he convinced Durrr he had AQ-AT, otherwise checking the river is pretty bad play by Durrr [though coincidentally any play by Durr except folding was giving him the same payoff], b/c Daniel isn't going to value bet the river w/ A8- or Kx or bluff river keeping in mind how spontaneously aggressive Durr plays and how Durr is capable of making loose calls. But, Daniel would call a small value bet on the river or might have called a min raise on the turn w/ A6+, given Durr's image and Daniel's loose calling range.
What I'm saying his flop play wasn't bad, and I suppose he made his preflop play to take a stand against the aggressive Durr in position.
you're right economist89
Why was checking a bad play on the river? The only time DN had shown aggression in a hand on that episode he was on a weaker hand/bluff. Did you see how he played the flopped full house? I'm convinced Durrrr thought DN had basically no calling value on that board, so he elected to check hoping that DN would go for a spewy river bluff. DN wasn't value betting or raising with any made hand, so what value is there in betting the river and actually hoping DN would call with air?
DN always seems to have really bad timing against Durrrr... which is a sign that the other player is inducing his opponent to play against him like he wishes.
to me he plays with fear when he plays live
Daniel does or Tom Dwan Does?
If you are meaning Tom Dwan, I don't believe you've seen him on t.v. enough if you actually believe he plays with fear.
If you are meaning Daniel, he is primarily a live player. Just recently he has begun to grind $100/$200nl online, but he only 1-2 tables for several hours at a time, and his results are less than ideal at the moment, but it's a pretty small sample size.
Either way, this comment doesn't really make sense.
Daniel live but still is better than DN
I was talking to Tom Dwan
in the game live i prefer Daniel
Last edited by dew12109; 4th April 2010 at 11:00 PM.
All right, I'm just really confused now. I'll just let this be.
sometimes he pushes the limits. giving several bluff ugly
Last edited by blakoltion; 1st April 2010 at 04:05 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks